That's hilarious.
You might want to rethink that.
lol

I'll be watching.

Yeah, I think you're pretty ridiculous, and I get a kick out of your endless logical contortions.

Here's the rebuttal I had, it took a while to get printed, because, apparently they lost it, and I had to resend it to them. I thought of starting a new thread, but here it is anyway:

Just as good as the first time I read it!

Do you think that Mr. Armstrong knows that both Hellman's and Best Foods Mayonnaise are made in the same plant with almost identical ingredients?

I don't know Steven...whizzing contest entry?...not great flow or force.
Maybe that's the price you pay for being basically a nice guy...or at least somewhat of one.

Nah, if it was a whizzing contest entry, it would have spent a lot of time go after individual points. I think that I pointed out that Mr. Armstrong is quite conservative (a point I don't think he would argue with), and that different perspectives will see the same thing differently. You're right, not meant to be forceful.


I don't know. I think that a lot of people have figured that out by now, since the "Known as" thing has been put on the jars and advertising for some time now. Even if he didn't, I do know that Mr. Armstrong is very good at finding things on the internet. Remember, it was Mr. Armstrong that came forward with the finding of the Denver report.

A certain percentage will always agree with Mr. Armstrong over me. Another percentage will agree with me before Mr. Armstrong. My hope is that those people in the middle will take the time to look into resources they trust and come up with their own opinion of what this law does. A few different letter writers (I didn't mention them by name, because it really was more than one, and I am not a fan of whizzing contests) stated something as fact that I knew to not be true. They might still stand by those positions, I haven't seen or heard back from them.

As far as being a nice guy, I try to be respectful. But that doesn't mean that I will sit back when someone says something that I know to not be true. When Beavis goes off on his accusations of racism, I don't buy it, and have said so. I don't have enough time to respond every time he says it, but it's out there. Are there racially motivated people out there? Oh yeah. I think there are more racially motivated people behind the Arizona law than are behind it because they love law and order. But not everyone backing it is a racist.

Okay, this post has lost its flow a long time ago...

Here's the thing on the PPACA and the abortion issue: the Dems, including the president, could have shut the door on the question. They chose not to. They left it open just enough for manipulation. Why do you suppose that is? States are opting out and the courts will probably be asked to rule sooner or later. Beyond the PPACA, tax dollars do fund abortions, here and abroad. It's a messy, ugly situation.

Because it's all a big conspiracy by us sociocommimuslimarxists to kill babies, because we think they are delicious, especially on the barbecue with a spit stuck right through their innocent little soft spots.

Yes, that's right, we left-wingers are cannibals who call fricaseed baby "the other white meat." These aborted babies are the centerpiece of our Friday Night Satan Worship Ritual Barbecue and Bake Sales, which we have every week in order to help bring about the collapse of everything decent and good.

Did you know "Democrat" is ancient Amharian means "Babies is Good Eatin'"?

So much for you keeping a secret!