#29314 - 05/26/10 04:55 PM
Re: Westport/Stafford Creek Fire Contract
[Re: FUBAR]
|
stranger
Registered: 05/26/10
Posts: 11
|
There are no Aberdeen FD personnel who volunteer with Montesano. I know their chief and he confirmed that. They do have a couple of guys who used to volunteer with Monte, but the union forced them to quit when they got hired at AFD. Supposedly there's one of them that volunteer with an all volunteer department up in Thurston County, but that's a different situation. The bylaws simply say they can't volunteer with a department that's also represented by the IAFF (which would make them a "scab" in the union's eye) or that is in material competition with an IAFF department. There are, however, several Hoquiam personnel who volunteer with Montesano.
Regardless, Aberdeen's union wins, but I wonder if the loss of political capital is going to be worth it.
Edited by anderson_t (05/26/10 04:58 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#29317 - 05/26/10 05:51 PM
Re: Westport/Stafford Creek Fire Contract
[Re: FUBAR]
|
stranger
Registered: 05/26/10
Posts: 11
|
I think that's part of the problem. The IAFF gives each local the decision making ability on what constitutes a complaint. Hoquiam apparently doesn't care what their guys do when they're off duty. Hence the reason so many of them volunteer around the Harbor. Aberdeen, however, takes a pretty strict view on their people volunteering. They made their guys who volunteered at Monte quit and they also decided to enforce bylaws on neighboring Westport when they tried to take some business away from them. Their guy who volunteers in Thurston County apparently doesn't raise their ire because it's an entirely volunteer department.
As a former union shop steward, I actually side with the Aberdeen guys, at least in theory. Can you imagine what would happen if I went in to the PUD and said I wanted to work as a lineman for free? Or maybe if I was a PUD union lineman but I lived in Thurston County and decided I loved doing it so much I wanted to volunteer my time with Puget Power on the weekends. I would understand the unions in this scenario being pretty *issed off, and I would agree. That's nothing more than being a scab worker. I don't think the fire department should be much different when it comes to union issues, but the reality is a little bit different when it comes to public perception. The public expects public safety issues should supersede union issues.
Edited by anderson_t (05/26/10 06:04 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#29326 - 05/27/10 01:53 PM
Re: Westport/Stafford Creek Fire Contract
[Re: FUBAR]
|
journeyman
Registered: 03/28/09
Posts: 97
Loc: Hoquiam
|
And this is a situation that taxpayers are always crying for - "cut down on expenditures.."
not really, I guess
_________________________
'you're not the boss of me..'
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|