Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#39723 - 12/06/11 03:05 PM Re: county tax levy shift [Re: Brit]
MWMI Offline
old hand

Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 715
Originally Posted By: Brit
Originally Posted By: Strider
Still a bit abstract. As I recall, the impact of the levy shift was to be $12 to $13 per $100,000 valuation for city dwellers. Looking at my last tax bill breakout, this means my county tax would increase by at least 8.7% from last year, plus the 1% additional increase. Since rural bills are not going down, and the county plans to do the levy shift to generate additional funds, this smells like an illegal tax hike, unless voter-approved.

Perhaps the picture could look a little different if someone could lay out actual numbers and calculations, and an explanation how it's all OK under the law.



Do you happen to know if the county commissioners have an attorney review their proposed actions for legal sufficiency? Surely this would be accomplished prior to implementation.


I do not know if this proposal was reviewed but they do have a rep from the pros. office that sits in the meetings and gives advice, etc similar to what city attorneys do.

Top
#39757 - 12/08/11 08:39 AM Re: county tax levy shift [Re: MWMI]
dkc Offline
stranger

Registered: 07/05/10
Posts: 10
I did a little more research and the 1% limit applies to the total tax collected amount, not on an individual tax payer. So the levy shift, while it does increase city dwellers taxes by more than 1%, does not violate the law as the total amount collected is not above the cap. I still feel the County Commissioners have done a horrible job through this crisis by not making the tough decisions years ago. At least it's an election year and let's hope someone worthwhile will file against both Willis and Wilson, it's time for a change!

Top
#39759 - 12/08/11 10:36 AM Re: county tax levy shift [Re: dkc]
MWMI Offline
old hand

Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 715
I agree about it being an election year. I am also hoping someone worthwhile/qualified files. IMO the current three office holders do not meet that simple criteria. Unfortunately the only person to officially announce does not fit that bill either, at least for me. I know of at least one more person who is seriously considering running. They are strongly leaning towards it but haven't made a final decision. I hope they do. It would be nice to have a variety of choices for once.

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3


Who's Online
3 Registered (funkycamper, 2 invisible), 50 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Ads
Shout Box

Newest Members
cocorala163, jimysakura, rtdjtyjytj, marcilly, rslijetgold
357 Registered Users
May
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

Monitored by TechTell