I'm relieved that you aren't going all Jeremiah Wright on the image thing.

Why would you think a frail pale-skinned depiction of Jesus Christ is the way I believe He appeared?

He looked like most other Galilean Semites of that time. He was tanned and weathered from sun exposure, and He was a carpenter. I married a young carpenter who built homes in the sun. His body certainly did not look pale and frail.

Btw, you know that forensic depiction is not an exact science, right? The depiction you displayed may look exactly the way Jesus appeared, or it may not.

The better question is...what do you think Jesus will look like when He returns?

Indeed, we can only speculate what he might have looked like and end up depicting him homogeneously.

Should the myth turn out to be real, I would say He's going to look really pissed.

I mostly agree with that.

But apparently not the definition of "illiterate"...

1: having little or no education; especially : unable to read or write <an illiterate population>
2a : showing or marked by a lack of familiarity with language and literature <an illiterate magazine> b : violating approved patterns of speaking or writing
3: showing or marked by a lack of acquaintance with the fundamentals of a particular field of knowledge <musically illiterate>

This is a perfect example of why I cannot take you seriously, especially after being accused in another thread of using $5 words...hardly the mark of an illiterate. You are a silly, silly man.

QED

Silly man, an illiterate wouldn't have a clue what that meant.

And you don't. And the debate is wasted on you because you never will.

Pwnage. Headshot. End game.

In your imagination.

Btw, why do you keep posting that icon showing you have a mouth full? Swallow or spit, fercryin'outloud.

Again you prove Beavis' point.